Week 13 - Day 2 (Chapter 10 pt 2 Behavior in Social & Cultural Context)
Navigate using audio
Behaviors in Social & Cultural Context
Stanford Prison Experiment
- Video
- Audio 0:02:06.831751
- Watching video
- Audio 0:02:06.831751
What does this tell us about roles?
- Audio 0:08:03.815588
- Roles are everywhere and they are powerful
- They cause us to behave differently
- Criticisms of the study
- Selective sampling
- Some belief that some of the people who wanted to be in the study were kind of biased to want power
- Selective sampling
- Lack of replicability
- Huge violation of participant rights
- Made a significant impact on the field in terms of what is okay to do
- Instructions may have encouraged the observed behavior
- Zambardo might have encouraged them to be agressive
- Could this also be viewed as a study about obedience to authority?
- If so, in what way?
- Audio 0:11:49.064318
- In studies, there is an implicit desire to please the experimenter
- Audio 0:15:08.827373
- Maybe the prisoners felt they needed to finish the experiment
- Audio 0:17:35.436633
- Audio 0:15:08.827373
- If so, in what way?
Audio 0:18:29.961066
ICA #13
- ____ are social positions that are governed by specific societal rules about what is and is not appropriate in social situations
- A: Norms
- B: Roles
- C: Occupations
- D: Relationships
- (B)
- Why do people conform their behaviors and opinions to fall in line with the behavior or expectations of others
- A: conforming is easy and feels good
- B: Because they want to avoid looking foolish
- C: We assume if other people are doing it, it’s right
- D: Both B and C
- (D)
- Audio 0:23:18.668246
- (D)
- ____ is the tendency for all the members of a group to think alike and suppress disagreement for the sake of harmony.
- A: diffusion of responsibility
- B: deindividuation
- C: group think
- D: obedience
- (C)
- Which of the following is NOT a reason why people obey authorities
- A: Avoid consequences
- B: maintain consistency
- C: they believe authority should be respected
- D: To gain privileged access or knowledge
- E: All of the above
- (E)
What’s driving these behaviors
Social cognition
Audio 0:25:50.754674
- An area of social psychology concerned with social influences on thought, memory, perception, and beliefs
Attributions
- Our causal explanations for other people’s behavior
- “Joe did what?! Why?????”
- Logical (not covered here) and illogical attributions
- Audio 0:27:56.242063
- Assume people are making rational judgements of their environment
- Thinking about all the available options and picking the one that makes the most sense
- This doesn’t match reality
- Audio 0:27:56.242063
- Attribution theory suggests that people are motivated to find situational or dispositional causes for their own and other people’s behaviors
- Audio 0:29:31.190519
- Person + Environment = Behavior
- Audio 0:29:31.190519
- Situational attribution
-
- Aladin
- Audio 0:30:09.597260
- He’s poor
- That’s why he steals bread
- Aladin
-
- Dispositional attribution
-
- Aladin
- He steals becauase he’s a theif
- Aladin
-
What determines the nature of our attribution (dispositional vs. situational)?
- Usually, the target of the attribution
- Dave Chappelle on attributions:
- Audio 0:32:31.083686
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLdim8hWR44
- Louis CK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xquhBIlDIpM
- Dave Chappelle on attributions:
- What is Dave getting at?
- Audio 0:35:10.221291
- The situational look at Oscar is he’s a grouch because he lives in a trash can
- The dispositional look is that he’s a grouch by nature
- Fundamental attribution error (FAE)
- The tendency to overestimate personality factors and underestimate the influence of the situation when drawing conclusions about the behavior of other people
- Audio 0:36:11.649640
- Think about someone with chronic pain
- They might be upset or irritable often
- You might make an FAE and say that that’s part of their personality
What causes the FAE?
- Audio 0:37:17.998503
- Situations lack salience and go unnoticed
- When you see someone doing something, you don’t care about what they were doing 4 minutes before
- If someone cuts you off in traffic, do you think “Oh I bet his wife is in labor and he’s going to see her in the hospital”
- You probably think “f*** you!”
- If someone cuts you off in traffic, do you think “Oh I bet his wife is in labor and he’s going to see her in the hospital”
- Availability heuristic
- When you see someone doing something, you don’t care about what they were doing 4 minutes before
- Underestimating the impact of the situation
- Classic experiments from last lecture
- Impact of situation may be salient initially, but then fade over time
- Audio 0:39:08.193296
- You might forget that your friend Kathy has a chronic pain disorder
- Audio 0:39:08.193296
- Belief that the person caused the situation
- Kathy is a bad person who does bad things
- Therefore she causes her own pain
- Or: Therefore she deserves her pain
- Kathy is a bad person who does bad things
What determines the nature of our attribution (dispositional vs. situational)?
- Audio 0:41:29.745766
- Usually, the target of the attribution (others FAE)
- Self-serving biases
- Audio 0:42:39.612463
- Tendency to attribute our successes to dispositional factors and our failures to situational factors
Self-Serving Biases
- Choosing the most flattering and forgiving attributions for our behavior
- “I’m not sexist; the male job candidate’s credentials were honestly just better.”
- “Well, I didn’t hire her because I honestly think a man would do the job better.”
- The “better than average” effect
- The tendency to believe that we are better, smarter, and kinder than others
- Example
- 70% of high school students said they were above the median for leadership skills
- Everyone is inclined to think they are above average
- 85% for getting along well with others
- 70% of high school students said they were above the median for leadership skills
- When the average person is exposed to the suffering of an innocent person, how do you think they will respond?
- What is a normative response?
- Audio 0:45:55.005819
- Feel bad for them
- Do normative responses always occur?
- No, usually people try to find a way that the person caused their pain
- The bias to believe that the world is fair
- Good people are rewarded and bad people are punished
- Karma essentially
- The just-world hypothesis
- “You reap what so you sow”, “They deserve what’s coming to them”
- Rooted in the need to predict one’s environment and make long-term goals
- Motivated responses victim blaming and victim derogation
- Good people are rewarded and bad people are punished
Vocab
Term | Definition |
---|---|
social cognition | An area of social psychology concerned with social influences on thought, memory, perception, and beliefs |
attributions | Our causal explanations for other people’s behavior |
attribution theory | suggests that people are motivated to find situational or dispositional causes for their own and other people’s behaviors |
situational attribution | Explaining behavior based on someone’s situation |
dispositional attribution | Explaining behavior based on someone’s inate personality |
fundamental attribution error | The tendency to overestimate personality factors and underestimate the influence of the situation when drawing conclusions about the behavior of other people |
self-serving bias | Tendency to attribute our successes to dispositional factors and our failures to situational factors |
better than average effect | Tendency to believe that we are better, smarter, and kinder than others |
just-world hypotheses | idea that good people are rewarded and bad people are punished (You reap what you sew) |